The O’s Anna Griffin paints a fairly unflattering picture of public school parents in Classroom divides. And after reading her profile in today’s InPortland of two parents in two different Multnomah County districts on a surface level, it’s hard to disagree with her gloom and doom prediction about our ability to address funding problems on a local level.
Portland Public leaders hope to try for a local-option property tax this fall. But over the longer term, a broader solution — be it citywide, regionwide or statewide — must be found. The biggest challenge in doing so appears to be convincing parents from different streets, neighborhoods and school districts that there is a common, city-spanning solution out there, and that what’s best for every kid is best for theirs.
While the article contains many valid points illustrating Griffin’s thesis, I was shaking my head from side to side at other overly-narrow examples given to bolster her case – when I wasn’t frustrated by what I perceived was an attempt to magnify divides in order to create dramatic tension, that is (haven’t we had enough of that with the recent coverage of the school reconfiguration proposals already?) This paragraph, near the end of the article, perfectly illustrates my point:
Wilson, for her part, says she does not know any parents from the city’s other districts or many parents from other schools, although she’d like to. She’s sheepish about how insular her world can be, but why? How many parents, even the most active, go out of their way to meet their counterparts elsewhere? Who has the time, or a reason?
I wouldn’t label myself a ‘most active’ parent by any stretch of the imagination – I’m rarely on site at either child’s school thanks to a full time job and the school bus transportation provided for my younger child, for example. But I disagree vehemently with the picture she paints of little isolated bubbles of parents, acquainted only with their own child’s school community. And I don’t agree with her point that parents can’t/won’t/shouldn’t be expected to come together as a cohesive force to address school funding issues because they’re too concerned about their own child’s needs first and foremost.
Within five minutes, for example, I was able to rattle off the names of ten families we have relationships with, all with children in eight or nine varied PPS schools from across the district – and that doesn’t include the families I know from the two schools my kids currently attend. It’s not that we’re social butterflies – instead, we’ve picked up acquaintances as part of our daily life, from participating in activities like soccer clubs and summer camps to our involvement in a religious community to the conversations I have with past and present co-workers.
I didn’t set out specifically to cross off ‘meet with parents at other schools’ earlier this week when I met friends for a girls night out over drinks, for example – but we did spend a lot of time thrashing through school funding/reconfiguration issues, and we all walked away with greater insight into the unique challenges present in other school communities. (That and the fact that the volume level at the early evening music offerings at Imbibe doesn’t lend itself well to conversation!)
I’d argue that most parents already do have similar networks established – we just may not be having those conversations, is all.
Maybe it’s time we started…