<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Can&#8217;t Ride 55</title>
	<atom:link href="http://portland.metblogs.com/2006/08/31/i-cant-ride-55/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://portland.metblogs.com/2006/08/31/i-cant-ride-55/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:46:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PAgent</title>
		<link>http://portland.metblogs.com/2006/08/31/i-cant-ride-55/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>PAgent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portland.metblogs.com/2006/08/31/i-cant-ride-55/#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>First and foremost, I don&#039;t think bikes should ride on freeways. I have done so, where it was the only way from Point A to Point B, but I think it&#039;s far too risky in general.

With that said, let me just say that the shoulders on most freeways are easily twice the width of a bike lane, and permit you to get much further away from traffic than you normally can, particularly compared to rural roads where there IS no shoulder or bike lane. Additionally, I think freeway shoulders would have far LESS road debris PER MILE than I normally have to dodge when I ride in town. Between loose gravel, broken beer bottles, trash, and storm drains, I sometimes spend more time outside the bike lane than in it.

Physics definitely says this is a bad idea, but you should realize that a freeway shoulder can be quite attractive to cyclists, rather than the opposite.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost, I don&#8217;t think bikes should ride on freeways. I have done so, where it was the only way from Point A to Point B, but I think it&#8217;s far too risky in general.</p>
<p>With that said, let me just say that the shoulders on most freeways are easily twice the width of a bike lane, and permit you to get much further away from traffic than you normally can, particularly compared to rural roads where there IS no shoulder or bike lane. Additionally, I think freeway shoulders would have far LESS road debris PER MILE than I normally have to dodge when I ride in town. Between loose gravel, broken beer bottles, trash, and storm drains, I sometimes spend more time outside the bike lane than in it.</p>
<p>Physics definitely says this is a bad idea, but you should realize that a freeway shoulder can be quite attractive to cyclists, rather than the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
